SHARE THIS WEBSITE:

Buy Me A Coffee

We may earn an affiliate commission if you make a purchase after clicking on links from our site. Learn more

Dr. John Campbell

The Dr. John Campbell YouTube channel is an educational treasure trove created by John Campbell, a retired Nurse Teacher and A&E nurse from England, with extensive experience in teaching across Asia and Africa. The channel’s primary aim is to assist students in understanding the nuances of various health care aspects. Dr. Campbell, whose PhD emphasized the development of open learning resources for nurses globally, shares his vast knowledge through a series of well-crafted videos.

Rumble Feed

  • Dementia after vaccination

    11:47 Dementia after vaccination Mr. Biden has had 6 covid shots and covid infection 3 times. Results, Increased incidence of MCI and AD in vaccinated individuals, particularly those receiving mRNA vaccines, within three months post-vaccination. mRNA vaccine group AD, Odds Ratio: 1.225 p = 0.026 MCI, Odds Ratio: 2.377 p less than 0.001 No significant relationship was found with vascular dementia or Parkinson's disease. October 2022, Biden receives new COVID-19 booster A potential association between COVID-19 vaccination and development of Alzheimer’s disease 28 May 2024 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38806183/ https://academic.oup.com/qjmed/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/qjmed/hcae103/7684274?login=false Background Concerns about vaccine side effects, particularly potential links to neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). Aim This study investigates the association between COVID-19 vaccination and the onset of AD, and it’s prodromal state, mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Design A nationwide, retrospective cohort study Korean National Health Insurance Service. Data recorded 3 months after vaccination Methods Seoul, South Korea, analyzed data from a random 50% sample, aged 65 and above, n = 558,017. Vaccinated group Unvaccinated group Patients with vascular dementia or Parkinson's disease served as controls. Conclusions Preliminary evidence suggests a potential link between COVID-19 vaccination, 1 day ago 13.6K views 44 comments

  • Hope Accord with Dr Craig

    13:32 Hope Accord with Dr Craig 1. THE IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION OF THE COVID-19 mRNA VACCINE PRODUCTS A growing body of evidence suggests that the widespread rollout of the novel Covid-19 mRNA vaccine products is contributing to an alarming rise in disability and excess deaths. The association observed between the vaccine rollout and these concerning trends is now supported by additional significant findings. These include the discovery of plausible biological mechanisms of harm demonstrated in laboratory and autopsy studies, as well as high rates of adverse events seen in randomised clinical trials and national surveillance programs. Altogether, these observations indicate a causal link. This new technology was granted emergency use authorisation to address a situation that no longer exists. Going forward, the burden of proof falls on those still advocating for these products to compellingly demonstrate that they aren’t resulting in net harm. Until such evidence is presented, regulators should suspend their use as a matter of standard medical precaution. 2. A COMPREHENSIVE RE-EVALUATION OF THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ALL COVID-19 VACCINE PRODUCTS Independent investigations must be properly resourced to allow a comprehensive re-evaluation of all Covid-19 vaccine products. There must be a full exploration of mechanisms of harm to provide insight into their impact on the human body, both short and long term. Effectiveness must be reassessed through a comprehensive review of actual clinical impact on illness and mortality, as opposed to synthetic results based on modelled assumptions. We call on the scientific community to come forward with findings from unpublished Covid-19 vaccine studies. This will help mitigate publication bias, whereby unfavourable results were often rejected or withheld due to fears of reputational damage. Crucially, government bodies and the pharmaceutical industry must also provide full transparency, granting access to previously undisclosed anonymised patient-level data from clinical trials and surveillance programs. These cumulative actions will help determine any real world benefit of these products versus the true extent of the damage caused. 3. THE IMMEDIATE RECOGNITION AND SUPPORT FOR THE VACCINE-INJURED The denial of vaccine injury is a betrayal of those who followed official directives, often under coercion from mandates restricting their access to work, education, travel, hospitality and sports. The vaccine-injured must be recognised and every effort made to understand their conditions. Support should include readily accessible multidisciplinary clinics offering investigation and treatment as well as appropriate compensation for all those who have been harmed. 4. THE RESTORATION OF ETHICAL PRINCIPLES ABANDONED DURING THE COVID-19 ERA Fundamental and cherished principles of medical ethics were disregarded on the premise of an emergency. These included: ‘first do no harm’, informed consent, bodily autonomy and the notion that adults protect children – not the other way around. The precautionary principle was inverted. Also, particularly concerning was the erosion of free speech – a democratic principle that underpinned the ability to question untested interventions whilst ensuring other principles were upheld. The consequence was exposing the public, especially healthy young people – including children – to unacceptable risks of harm. Emergencies are never a reason to abandon our principles; it is precisely at such times that we most profoundly depend on them. Only after acknowledging they were wrongly abandoned can we commit to upholding them consistently and in doing so, better protect future generations. 5. ADDRESSING THE ROOT CAUSES OF OUR CURRENT PREDICAMENT The medical profession must lead by admitting we lost our way. By drawing attention to these medical and ethical issues surrounding the Covid-19 response, we hope to validate and amplify the call to establish the relevant facts and ensure vital lessons are learned. An honest and thorough investigation is needed, addressing the root causes that have led us to this place, including institutional groupthink, conflicts of interest and the suppression of scientific debate. We ultimately seek a renewed commitment to the core principles of ethical medicine, returning to an era in which we strive for transparency, accountability and responsible decision-making throughout the spheres of medicine and public health. 5 days ago 20.9K views 49 comments

  • State overreach

    14:26 State overreach Mother wins battle to stop son having Covid vaccine she feared could kill him https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/07/13/mother-battle-covid-jab-feared-kill-son/ Landmark case Sarah, Tom’s mum Kafkaesque nightmare’ that nearly bankrupted her Franz Kafka German-language from Prague Writing fuses elements of realism and the fantastic Typically features isolated protagonists, facing bizarre or surrealistic predicaments and incomprehensible socio-bureaucratic powers. Tom (24) Rare heart condition, learning difficulties Chromosome abnormality Doctors and social workers Demanded that he be injected for the “greater good of society” The experts Professor, paediatrics Martin McCaffrey (US) Tom was more likely to suffer heart complications – such as myocarditis and pericarditis – if given the mRNA vaccine. Because Tom has partial trisomy 13 he was more likely to suffer heart complications if given the mRNA vaccine. Professor, paediatrics Adam Finn, (UK) Agreed with Prof McCaffrey, stressed the possibility of such adverse side-effects would not have changed public policy at the height of the pandemic. Sarah (60) Battle has eroded her trust in public organisations such as social services, doctors and the courts, Government introduced a policy that ignores individual circumstances. Spent her life savings (£25,000) plus £60,000 crowdfunding. Threatened with arrest, jail, seizure of her assets, possibility of Tom being removed from home to be “forcibly jabbed”. “It has felt like a Kafkaesque nightmare because I was taking on the state that wouldn’t budge. “I went from being a loving mother and Tom’s sole carer to a near criminal. I have been made to feel like a liar, a bad person and a fanatic. “I was wrongly accused of being an anti-vaxxer just for questioning whether this new gene therapy was right for my son and his complex conditions. To me, it was the state that was fanatical about its policy by bringing its might to bear down upon me. “Doctors, cardiologists, lawyers and social workers hid behind Government guidance, which is just that – guidance.” Court of Protection Assigned Tom a lawyer to act in his “best interests”. Lawyer and local integrated care board, agreed with vaccination Judge Burrows, Tom was in an at-risk group and so should have the jab, Court was “ill-equipped” to say if the vaccine was safe or not but taking it was “altruistic” and required of every citizen. Mr Justice Hayden “no longer in Tom’s best interests to receive the jab” “changing landscape of the virus and increasing immunity within the community” had created a “wholly changed situation” “genuinely pleased” to conclude it was “no longer in Tom’s best interests to receive the Covid vaccination”. Paul Diamond, Sarah’s barrister “mother who loves her child” In future all parties involved in similar legal disputes should adopt a “more cooperative” rather than “aggressive” approach. Stephen Jackson, Sarah’s solicitor “love and good decision-making meant he is now 24 years old”. Ruling that the judge’s reliance on the virus’s “changing landscape” meant he had not tackled “uncomfortable issues”. “Prof McCaffrey’s findings were that the working assumption should be that individuals with trisomy – those who have 47 instead of 46 chromosomes – may be less able to cope with mRNA gene therapy technology in the vaccine,” “More investigation is needed. But anyone caring for those with trisomy conditions, such as Down’s Syndrome and Edwards’ Syndrome, should be made aware of Prof McCaffrey’s warning.” “Yet the court and state and lawyers and medics who’ve never met Tom decided they should make decisions for him and denied his mother had any rights at all. “State overreach and attack on the family unit could not be clearer. This situation is being faced by many families up and down the land.” The Hope Accord https://thehopeaccord.org The Hope Accord, resources https://thehopeaccord.org/resources Unsafe and Defective: Dr Clare Craig https://peoplesvaccineinquiry.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/HART-Witness-Statement-Dr-Clare-Craig.pdf Co-chair of the Health Advisory and Recovery Team (HART) https://www.hartgroup.org 10 days ago 37.9K views 99 comments

  • Human Rights

    18:26 Human Rights Human Rights Act 1998 Article 2 Right to life Everyone’s right to life shall be protected by law. No one shall be deprived of his life intentionally save in the execution of a sentence of a court following his conviction of a crime for which this penalty is provided by law. Article 3Prohibition of torture No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/schedule/1 Direct link to Dave, Independent Researcher https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryclosing https://twitter.com/biologyphenom 15 days ago 25.4K views 103 comments

  • African Synergy

    57:42 African Synergy A way forward in health and environmental care. If you would like to donate to the work in Uganda, 100% of donations go directly to the project, we currently spend 0% on admin. https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=XS59XPZ527YFL Link to Wefwafwa’s youtube channel, https://www.youtube.com/@WefwafwaAndrew Link to our organization's website: https://buwanga.org/ To contact Wefwafwa directly, wefandrew@gmail.com or WhatsApp+256756320736 16 days ago 22.3K views 24 comments

  • The hope Accord, details

    23:59 The hope Accord, details THE HOPE ACCORD https://thehopeaccord.org ONE THE IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION OF THE COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE PRODUCTS A growing body of evidence suggests that the widespread rollout of the novel Covid-19 mRNA vaccine products is contributing to an alarming rise in disability and excess deaths. The association observed between the vaccine rollout and these concerning trends is now supported by additional significant findings. These include the discovery of plausible biological mechanisms of harm demonstrated in laboratory and autopsy studies, as well as high rates of adverse events seen in randomised clinical trials and national surveillance programs. Altogether, these observations indicate a causal link. This new technology was granted emergency use authorisation to address a situation that no longer exists. Going forward, the burden of proof falls on those still advocating for these products to compellingly demonstrate that they aren’t resulting in net harm. Until such evidence is presented, regulators should suspend their use as a matter of standard medical precaution. TWO A COMPREHENSIVE RE-EVALUATION OF THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ALL COVID-19 VACCINE PRODUCTS Independent investigations must be properly resourced to allow a comprehensive re-evaluation of all Covid-19 vaccine products. There must be a full exploration of mechanisms of harm to provide insight into their impact on the human body, both short and long term. Effectiveness must be reassessed through a comprehensive review of actual clinical impact on illness and mortality, as opposed to synthetic results based on modelled assumptions. We call on the scientific community to come forward with findings from unpublished Covid-19 vaccine studies. This will help mitigate publication bias, whereby unfavourable results were often rejected or withheld due to fears of reputational damage. Crucially, government bodies and the pharmaceutical industry must also provide full transparency, granting access to previously undisclosed anonymised patient-level data from clinical trials and surveillance programs. These cumulative actions will help determine any real world benefit of these products versus the true extent of the damage caused. THREE THE IMMEDIATE RECOGNITION AND SUPPORT FOR THE VACCINE-INJURED The denial of vaccine injury is a betrayal of those who followed official directives, often under coercion from mandates restricting their access to work, education, travel, hospitality and sports. The vaccine-injured must be recognised and every effort made to understand their conditions. Support should include readily accessible multidisciplinary clinics offering investigation and treatment as well as appropriate compensation for all those who have been harmed. FOUR THE RESTORATION OF ETHICAL PRINCIPLES ABANDONED DURING THE COVID-19 ERA Fundamental and cherished principles of medical ethics were disregarded on the premise of an emergency. These included: ‘first do no harm’, informed consent, bodily autonomy and the notion that adults protect children – not the other way around. The precautionary principle was inverted. Also, particularly concerning was the erosion of free speech – a democratic principle that underpinned the ability to question untested interventions whilst ensuring other principles were upheld. The consequence was exposing the public, especially healthy young people – including children – to unacceptable risks of harm. Emergencies are never a reason to abandon our principles; it is precisely at such times that we most profoundly depend on them. Only after acknowledging they were wrongly abandoned can we commit to upholding them consistently and in doing so, better protect future generations. FIVE ADDRESSING THE ROOT CAUSES OF OUR CURRENT PREDICAMENT The medical profession must lead by admitting we lost our way. By drawing attention to these medical and ethical issues surrounding the Covid-19 response, we hope to validate and amplify the call to establish the relevant facts and ensure vital lessons are learned. An honest and thorough investigation is needed, addressing the root causes that have led us to this place, including institutional groupthink, conflicts of interest and the suppression of scientific debate We ultimately seek a renewed commitment to the core principles of ethical medicine, returning to an era in which we strive for transparency, accountability and responsible decision-making throughout the spheres of medicine and public health. 18 days ago 32.6K views 72 comments

  • The Hope Accord

    4:28 The Hope Accord THE HOPE ACCORD https://thehopeaccord.org ONE THE IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION OF THE COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE PRODUCTS TWO A COMPREHENSIVE RE-EVALUATION OF THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ALL COVID-19 VACCINE PRODUCTS THREE THE IMMEDIATE RECOGNITION AND SUPPORT FOR THE VACCINE-INJURED FOUR THE RESTORATION OF ETHICAL PRINCIPLES ABANDONED DURING THE COVID-19 ERA FIVE ADDRESSING THE ROOT CAUSES OF OUR CURRENT PREDICAMENT 18 days ago 23.7K views 39 comments

  • Excess deaths in 2024

    12:46 Excess deaths in 2024 OECD data, Excess deaths https://data-explorer.oecd.org/vis?tm=excess%20mortality&pg=0&snb=3&df[ds]=dsDisseminateFinalDMZ&df[id]=DSD_HEALTH_MORTALITY%40DF_MORTALITY_EXCESS&df[ag]=OECD.ELS.HD&df[vs]=1.0&dq=.W.EM._T._T.&pd=2023-W01%2C&to[TIME_PERIOD]=false&ly[cl]=REF_AREA%2CUNIT&ly[rw]=TIME_PERIOD&vw=tb https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/excess-mortality-p-scores-average-baseline UK, Jan 2023 – week 16 2024 Total = 63,455 Weekly average = 7.9% US, Jan 2023 – week 16 2024 Total = 366,894 Weekly average, 10.0% Australia, 1 Jan 2023 – week 47 2023 Total = 18,421 Weekly average, 12.9% Canada, 1 Jan 2023 – week 6, 2024 Total = 59,011 Weekly average, 19.1% Weekly average for weeks 1 -6, 2024 = 14.6% Israel, Jan 2023 – week 16, 2024 Total = 7,332 Weekly average, 12.5% Weekly average for weeks 1 -16, 2024 5.8% 6.15% 12.4% 14.5% 17% 28.8% 20.5% 26% 26.7% 19.1% 21.8% 13.8% 10.3% 15.1% 6.3% Netherlands, Jan 2023 – week 16 2024 Total = 25,071 Weekly average, 13% Maintained for first 16 weeks of 2024 NZ Jan 2023 – week 16 2024 Total = 6,303 Weekly average 15.3% 19 days ago 32.9K views 164 comments

  • Medical mushrooms

    25:34 Medical mushrooms Isle of Wight mushroom farm, https://www.iwmushrooms.co.uk/ Thanks to Alex and Dana for showing us around and teaching us about functional mushrooms. 21 days ago 21.1K views 45 comments

  • Dementia awareness

    17:53 Dementia awareness Patient may be a risk to themselves and others. Lewy body dementias (LBD), 1.4 million in the United States. https://www.lbda.org/10-things-you-should-know-about-lbd/ Presence of Lewy bodies Typically progresses rapidly Lewy Body Dementia Association We understand that though many families are affected by this disease, few individuals and medical professionals are aware of the symptoms, diagnostic criteria, or even that LBD exists. Lewy body dementias (LBD) are the second most common form of degenerative dementia. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is most common. LBD can have three common presentations Some start with a movement disorder leading to the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease and later develop dementia. This is diagnosed as Parkinson’s disease dementia. Others start with a cognitive/memory disorder that may be mistaken for AD, leading to the diagnosis of ‘dementia with Lewy bodies’ (DLB). A small group will first present with neuropsychiatric symptoms, hallucinations, behavioral problems, difficulty with complex mental activities The most common symptoms of LBD include: Impaired thinking, such as loss of executive function (planning, processing information), memory, or the ability to understand visual information Fluctuations in cognition, attention, or alertness Problems with movement, including tremors, stiffness, slowness, and difficulty walking Visual hallucinations (seeing things that are not present) The symptoms of LBD are treatable Early and accurate diagnosis of LBD is essential Early and accurate diagnosis is important because LBD patients may react to certain medications differently than AD or PD patients. A variety of drugs, including some dementia meds and some antiparkinsonian medications, can worsen LBD symptoms. (LBD affects an individual’s brain differently than other dementias). Treatment should always be monitored by a physician and may include prescriptive and other therapies, exercise, diet, sleep habits, changes in behavior, and daily routines. Individuals and families living with LBD should not have to face this disease alone. LBD affects every aspect of a person – their mood, the way they think, and the way they move. The combination of cognitive, motor and behavioral symptoms creates a highly challenging set of demands for continuing care. Physician education is urgently needed. More research is urgently needed. Research needs include tools for early diagnoses, such as screening questionnaires, biomarkers, neuroimaging techniques, and more effective therapies. Currently, there is no specific test to diagnose LBD. 24 days ago 39.3K views 178 comments

  • Loss of trust

    11:40 Loss of trust 33% Agree COVID-19 Vaccine ‘Is Killing Large Numbers of People’ How much trust do you now have for the medical and pharmaceutical industries? A lot of trust, 17% Some trust, 37% Not much trust at all, 25% No trust, 18% Not much or none = 43% https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2023/population-estimates-age-sex.html https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/popest/2020s-national-detail.html 262, 083, 034 Not much or none = 112, 695, 704 Do you agree or disagree with this statement about COVID-19 vaccines: "The vaccine is killing people, and is killing large numbers of people." Strongly agree, 16% Somewhat agree, 17% Somewhat disagree, 18% Strongly disagree, 39% Agree and strongly agree = 33% Agree and strongly agree = 86, 487,401 Conducted June 13 and 16-17, 2024 https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/public_surveys/crosstabs_2_covid_19_vaccine_june_13_and_16_17_2024 https://www.rasmussenreports.com In regard to getting vaccinated against the COVID-19 virus, which of the following best describes you: Adults, n = 1,223 No vaccine taken, 25% One vaccine, 14% More than one vaccine, 20% Two vaccines + booster, 38% Do you regret taking covid vaccine? One vaccine, 35% More than one vaccine, 43% Two vaccines + booster, 22% How much trust do you now have for the medical and pharmaceutical industries? Some trust No vaccine taken, 15% One vaccine, 12% More than one vaccine, 19% Two vaccines + booster, 53% Not much trust No vaccine taken, 30% One vaccine, 19% More than one vaccine, 27% Two vaccines + booster, 22% No trust at all No vaccine taken, 53% One vaccine, 18% More than one vaccine, 17% Two vaccines + booster, 10% Do you agree or disagree with this statement about COVID-19 vaccines: "The vaccine is killing people, and is killing large numbers of people." Strongly agree No vaccine taken, 58% One vaccine, 14% More than one vaccine, 16% Two vaccines + booster, 11% Somewhat agree No vaccine taken, 40% One vaccine, 20% More than one vaccine, 26% Two vaccines + booster, 11% Somewhat disagree No vaccine taken, 24% One vaccine, 19% More than one vaccine, 33% Two vaccines + booster, 22% Strongly disagree No vaccine taken, 5% One vaccine, 8% More than one vaccine, 14% Two vaccines + booster, 72% 26 days ago 23.7K views 65 comments

  • Viral origine, Senate hearing

    9:48 Viral origine, Senate hearing Senate Homeland Security Committee Holds Hearing on the Origins of COVID-19 https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/hearings/origins-of-covid-19-an-examination-of-available-evidence/ FULL COMMITTEE HEARING ORIGINS OF COVID-19: AN EXAMINATION OF AVAILABLE EVIDENCE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kbUDmJPwtU 1 month ago 33.5K views 102 comments

  • Evidence based communication

    33:43 Evidence based communication With my special thanks to my hosts, the Australian Medical Professionals’ Society, https://amps.redunion.com.au Direct link to this talk and others, https://amps.redunion.com.au/covid_revisited/program This talk was given as part of the AMPS conference in Sydney, Australia, April 2024. 1 month ago 21.6K views 47 comments

  • Miscarriage after vaccine

    6:14 Miscarriage after vaccine Pfizer misled the public that it had a “safe and effective” COVID-19 vaccine. https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/egvboakldpq/2024-06-15-pfizer-complaint-(002).pdf Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was safe even though it knew its COVID-19 vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis, failed pregnancies, and deaths. Pfizer concealed this critical safety information from the public. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was effective even though it knew its COVID- 19 vaccine waned over time and did not protect against COVID-19 variants. Pfizer concealed this critical effectiveness information from the public. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine would prevent transmission of COVID-19 even though it knew it never studied the effect of its vaccine on transmission of COVID-19. To keep the public from learning the truth, Pfizer worked to censor speech on social media that questioned Pfizer’s claims about its COVID-19 vaccine. Pfizer’s misrepresentations of a “safe and effective” vaccine resulted in record company revenue of approximately $75 billion from COVID-19 vaccine sales in just two years. Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to its COVID-19 vaccine violated previous consent judgments with the State of Kansas. Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to its COVID-19 vaccine violated the Kansas Consumer Protection Act Pfizer must be held accountable for falsely representing the benefits of its COVID- 19 vaccine while concealing and suppressing the truth about its vaccine’s safety risks, waning effectiveness, and inability to prevent transmission. 28. Millions of Kansans heard Pfizer’s misrepresentations about its COVID-19 vaccine. 29. In May 2021, Pfizer advertised to Kansans on Facebook about its “life-saving vaccines” and its “cures.” 30. Pfizer took advantage of Kansans’ fear of COVID-19 and desire for safety by offering a “safe and effective” COVID-19 vaccine, while concealing, suppressing, and omitting material information that undermined its safety and effectiveness claims. in Kansas. B. Pfizer used confidentiality agreements to conceal critical data relating to the safety and effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine. 57. Pfizer has kept data hidden through confidentiality agreements with governments around the world. C. Pfizer used an extended study timeline to conceal critical data relating to the safety and effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine. 65. Scientists were outraged that they still could not review Pfizer’s COVID-19 study data. “Pfizer’s pivotal COVID vaccine trial was funded by the company and designed, run, analysed, and authored by Pfizer employees. The company and the contract research organisations that carried out the trial hold all the data.” D. Pfizer used FOIA denial and delay to conceal critical data relating to the safety and effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine. E. Pfizer destroyed the vaccine control group, which will conceal critical data relating to the safety and effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine. 86. Pfizer planned to follow COVID-19 vaccine study participants, both vaccine and placebo recipients, for 24 months to monitor the safety and effectiveness of its vaccine. 87. Once the FDA approved Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine through an emergency use authorization in December 2020, Pfizer unblinded the study participants and offered vaccine placebo recipients the option to receive the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. 88. Of the 21,921 vaccine trial participants who received the placebo, more than 20,000 placebo participants decided to receive the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine as of March 13, 2021. 1 month ago 28.9K views 121 comments

  • Pfizer in court, Kansas

    13:02 Pfizer in court, Kansas Pfizer misled the public that it had a “safe and effective” COVID-19 vaccine. https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/egvboakldpq/2024-06-15-pfizer-complaint-(002).pdf Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was safe even though it knew its COVID-19 vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis, failed pregnancies, and deaths. Pfizer concealed this critical safety information from the public. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was effective even though it knew its COVID- 19 vaccine waned over time and did not protect against COVID-19 variants. Pfizer concealed this critical effectiveness information from the public. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine would prevent transmission of COVID-19 even though it knew it never studied the effect of its vaccine on transmission of COVID-19. To keep the public from learning the truth, Pfizer worked to censor speech on social media that questioned Pfizer’s claims about its COVID-19 vaccine. Pfizer’s misrepresentations of a “safe and effective” vaccine resulted in record company revenue of approximately $75 billion from COVID-19 vaccine sales in just two years. Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to its COVID-19 vaccine violated previous consent judgments with the State of Kansas. Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to its COVID-19 vaccine violated the Kansas Consumer Protection Act Pfizer must be held accountable for falsely representing the benefits of its COVID- 19 vaccine while concealing and suppressing the truth about its vaccine’s safety risks, waning effectiveness, and inability to prevent transmission. 28. Millions of Kansans heard Pfizer’s misrepresentations about its COVID-19 vaccine. 29. In May 2021, Pfizer advertised to Kansans on Facebook about its “life-saving vaccines” and its “cures.” 30. Pfizer took advantage of Kansans’ fear of COVID-19 and desire for safety by offering a “safe and effective” COVID-19 vaccine, while concealing, suppressing, and omitting material information that undermined its safety and effectiveness claims. in Kansas. B. Pfizer used confidentiality agreements to conceal critical data relating to the safety and effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine. 57. Pfizer has kept data hidden through confidentiality agreements with governments around the world. C. Pfizer used an extended study timeline to conceal critical data relating to the safety and effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine. 65. Scientists were outraged that they still could not review Pfizer’s COVID-19 study data. “Pfizer’s pivotal COVID vaccine trial was funded by the company and designed, run, analysed, and authored by Pfizer employees. The company and the contract research organisations that carried out the trial hold all the data.” D. Pfizer used FOIA denial and delay to conceal critical data relating to the safety and effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine. E. Pfizer destroyed the vaccine control group, which will conceal critical data relating to the safety and effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine. 86. Pfizer planned to follow COVID-19 vaccine study participants, both vaccine and placebo recipients, for 24 months to monitor the safety and effectiveness of its vaccine. 87. Once the FDA approved Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine through an emergency use authorization in December 2020, Pfizer unblinded the study participants and offered vaccine placebo recipients the option to receive the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. 88. Of the 21,921 vaccine trial participants who received the placebo, more than 20,000 placebo participants decided to receive the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine as of March 13, 2021. 1 month ago 19.7K views 70 comments

Disclaimer: The listing on this page does not imply endorsement or affiliation with the represented entity. We have no commercial relationship with the listed resource. This listing is provided for informational purposes only. The use of logos, cover art, and other branded materials is intended to aid in the recognition and identification of each listed resource, facilitating users’ exploration and understanding. Our use of these materials is believed to fall under the “fair use” doctrine, as it is transformative in nature, meant for educational and informational purposes, and does not seek to compete with or diminish the market value of the original works. We aim to respect and promote the original content creators. If you are a copyright holder and believe your content has been used in a way that constitutes an infringement, please contact us for immediate review and action. For more information, please read our Fair Use Disclaimer.

Share

en_USEnglish